Only a tiny fraction of the scientific work that needs to be done on Earth's known impact craters has been accomplished, and only a small fraction of the planet's craters have been discovered. Even more work remains to be done on other surfaces in the solar system. With the following list of questions, topics, and references to examples of specific kinds of work, I hope to save others a bit of time and effort if they are beginning to consider the field from the perspective of a researcher.
The order of the topics in the list is somewhat arbitrary, though I've tried to place them more-or-less sequentially in a manner such that each informs the following: ie: Prove there is a crater, describe its rough location, place it in time and in a contemporary geological setting, characterize the impactor, understand the geological and geographical setting at the time of impact, and so on. The list is far from exhaustive, and will grow with time.
Crater confirmation - Is the structure a crater?
Crater Morphometry - What is the structure's physical shape and size?
Context - What rocks were here and where have they moved to?
Impactites - How did impact alter the rocks?
Constraints on Peak Shock Pressure
Other High Pressure Polymorphs and Shock Effects (Petrographic)
Historical / Paleo- Setting and Effects of the Impact:
Crater age:
Characterizing the impactor:
Surface crater mapping: GIS topography, faults and rock units, Morphology and topography?
Subsurface and Remote Studies
Contribution to Global Understanding
Post-impact processes -
There are also non-crater-specific studies - impact modelling, high pressure mineral phases, crater accumulation rates, crater to impactor scaling, morphology to impact energy scaling, morphology to rock type scaling, hypervelocity impact physics, extinctions studies.
And non-traditional cratering questions: effects of impacts in water and in air (meteors).
And of indirect changes: proximal and distal ejecta studies (sometimes without an associated crater), Ir anomalies, sperules and spherule beds, tsunamite and paleoseismic deposits.
Inferred impact risk and impact risk abatement.
Bibliography:
Bell, M.S. (2010) GSA Special Papers, 1-20.
Henderson, T. and Milam, K. A. (2014) Initial XRD analysis of Silurian carbonates from the central peak of the Kentland impact structure, Newton County, Indiana, USA (abstract). Abstracts of the 2014 GSA Annual Meeting, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 46, No. 6, p.760.
Henderson, T. and Milam, K. A. 2015. XRD Analyses of Silurian Dolostones from the Central Uplift of the Kentland Impact Structure, Newton County, Indiana, USA (abstract). 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.
Ská- la, R. and Jakeš, P. (1999) GSA Special Papers, 339, 205-214.
Skála, R. and Hörz, F. (2002) GSA Special Papers, 356, 3070.
Huson, S.A., et al. (2009) Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 44, 1695-1706.
----------------------------------------------------
below this line are website development notes to myself:
update and upgrade summary graphics with appropriate citations
finish integrating basic bibliographies / annotations
produce single-page 'information sheet' downloadable PDF summaries for each site
convert all references to consistent format
Update LPSC, GSA, and AAPG abstracts:
Search GSA abstracts: https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/htsearch.cgi
Search LPSC abstracts:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/abstracts.shtml
Search AAPG abstracts: http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/
get copies of those publications not already on hand
provide well cited summary paragraph of basic metrics for each crater
cross-link to Odale pages, eg: http://ottawa-rasc.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Odale_articles_Glover_Bluff
Build and provide summary metrics of US craters on intro page
Note the notable gaps in knowledge about each crater on the associated individual crater pages.
Somehow distinguish key articles and field guides.
It would be nice to do a mini stratigraphic profile for each, with depth of cover, depth of sedimentary target rock, depth to basement, uplift height, and known depth of disturbance. Could relate this to diameters as well, to create a nice picture of the set.
-----------------------------------------------------------
There is occasionally some humor in attempts to describe impact megabreccia or central uplifts by geologists using conventional mapping techniques, particularly when these descriptions were written before the impact paradigm had fully emerged or been accepted. The frustration, at times, must have been considerable. I've collected a few humorously poignant examples here:
This one is from Robert Boyer, 1953. "A rotational type of fault of greater size separates the eastern and western portions of the quarry. A rotation of 90 degrees resulted in the attitude of bedding of the two halves of the quarry being essentially at right angles." < This is how you cuss in a top hat. >
Another from the same work: "The exact locations of the fault planes are often difficult to map, and intense shattering of all of the rock aids in disguising them." < I paraphrased this in marginalia as "#$@&%*!" >
Raymond Gutschick (1983) wrote: "More than 1000 feet (305 m) of stratigraphic section or succession is exposed in fault blocks in the quarry, even though the maximum depth of the quarry is only 330 feet (101 m)!" <It's bigger on the inside.>
Copyright 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 United States Meteorite Impact Craters. All rights reserved.